ISBN: 9780226314518

By Sydney A. Halpern. Halpern explores this logic of risk in immunization controversies extending as far back as the eighteenth century. Then, focusing on the period between 1930 and 1960… Más…

By Sydney A. Halpern. Halpern explores this logic of risk in immunization controversies extending as far back as the eighteenth century. Then, focusing on the period between 1930 and 1960, she shows how research physicians and their sponsors debated the moral quandaries involved in moving vaccine use from the laboratory to the clinic. The Nile on eBay   FREE SHIPPING UK WIDE   Lesser Harms by Sydney A. Halpern Research physicians face intractable dilemmas when they consider introducing new medical procedures. Innovations carry the promise of preventing or curing life-threatening diseases, but they can also lead to injury or even death. How have clinical scientists made high-stakes decisions about undertaking human tests of new medical treatments? In &quot;Lesser Harms,&quot; Sydney Halpern explores this issue as she examines vaccine trials in America during the early and mid-twentieth century.Today&#039;s scientists follow federal guidelines for research on human subjects developed during the 1960s and 1970s. But long before these government regulations, medical investigators observed informal rules when conducting human research. They insisted that the dangers of natural disease should outweigh the risks of a medical intervention, and they struggled to accurately assess the relative hazards. Halpern explores this logic of risk in immunization controversies extending as far back as the eighteenth century. Then, focusing on the period between 1930 and 1960, she shows how research physicians and their sponsors debated the moral quandaries involved in moving vaccine use from the laboratory to the clinic.This probing work vividly describes the efforts of clinical investigators to balance the benefits and dangers of untested vaccines, to respond to popular sentiment about medical hazards, and to strategically present risk laden research to sponsors and the public.&quot;Concise and extremely well-written. . . . A fascinating synthesis of sociology, history, and institutional theory.&quot;&mdash;Samuel C. Blackman, &quot;Journal of the American Medical Association&quot; FORMATHardcover LANGUAGEEnglish CONDITIONBrand New Publisher Description Research physicians face intractable dilemmas when they consider introducing new medical procedures. Innovations carry the promise of preventing or curing life-threatening diseases, but they can also lead to injury or even death. How have clinical scientists made high-stakes decisions about undertaking human tests of new medical treatments? In Lesser Harms, Sydney Halpern explores this issue as she examines vaccine trials in America during the early and mid-twentieth century.Today's scientists follow federal guidelines for research on human subjects developed during the 1960s and 1970s. But long before these government regulations, medical investigators observed informal rules when conducting human research. They insisted that the dangers of natural disease should outweigh the risks of a medical intervention, and they struggled to accurately assess the relative hazards. Halpern explores this logic of risk in immunization controversies extending as far back as the eighteenth century. Then, focusing on the period between 1930 and 1960, she shows how research physicians and their sponsors debated the moral quandaries involved in moving vaccine use from the laboratory to the clinic.This probing work vividly describes the efforts of clinical investigators to balance the benefits and dangers of untested vaccines, to respond to popular sentiment about medical hazards, and to strategically present risk laden research to sponsors and the public. "Concise and extremely well-written. . . . A fascinating synthesis of sociology, history, and institutional theory."—Samuel C. Blackman, Journal of the American Medical Association Author Biography Sydney A. Halpern is professor of sociology and medical humanities at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She is the author of American Pediatrics: The Social Dynamics of Professionalism, 1880-1920. Table of Contents Acknowledgments List of Abbreviations Introduction 1. The Origins of a Moral Logic of Risk 2. Negotiating Moral Boundaries: The Polio Vaccines of 1934-1935 3. Research Sponsors and the Culture of Risk 4. Formalizing Responses to Research Hazards 5. The Social Nature of Moral Action 6. Moral Traditions in an Era of Government Oversight Notes Selected Bibliography Index Review "In LesserHarms Sydney Halpern traces the evolution of moral codes for conducting medical research right back to the 18th century, from the informal pressures exerted by professional networks during the testing of live polio vaccines through to the strict formal rules laid down by bodies like the FDA for gene therapy trials. She shows how far we've come in protecting the people who volunteer for clinical trials, and demonstrates why it's still not far enough. . . . Medical ethicists, researchers, policy makers and historians should read it. Volunteers in future clinical trials will thank them."-- "New Scientist"The story told in Lesser Harms should . . . inspire researchers and regulators to renew discussions of why risk minimization is of paramount importance.--Adrienne Martic "Health Affairs""In this concise and extremely well-written volume, Dr. Halpern . . . examines the moral traditions that govern the introduction of new medical interventions before and after the advent of federal regulation. To trace this evolution and illustrate her assertions, she uses innovations in the field of vaccine research in the United States during the 19th and 20th centuries. . . . Lesser Harms, while most certainly a scholarly work, provides a perspective on medical science that would also be appreciated by a broad audience. It would most certainly be of interest to physicians, both clinical and laboratory scientists, and those who design and participate in any aspoect of human subjects research."--Samuel C. Blackman "Journal of the American Medical Association" (8/3/2005 12:00:00 AM) Review Quote "This is a fascinating and timely book that deserves the attention of anyone interested in the complex questions accompanying the ethics of medical research."-Jeffrey P. Baker,The New England Journal of Medicine Details ISBN0226314510 Author Sydney A. Halpern Language English ISBN-10 0226314510 ISBN-13 9780226314518 Media Book Format Hardcover Year 2004 Imprint University of Chicago Press Subtitle The Morality of Risk in Medical Research Place of Publication Chicago, IL Country of Publication United States Edition 1st Short Title LESSER HARMS Pages 246 DOI 10.1604/9780226314518 AU Release Date 2004-11-15 NZ Release Date 2004-11-15 US Release Date 2004-11-15 UK Release Date 2004-11-15 Publisher The University of Chicago Press Series Morality and Society Series Publication Date 2004-11-15 DEWEY 610.72 Audience Professional & Vocational We've got thisAt The Nile, if you're looking for it, we've got it.With fast shipping, low prices, friendly service and well over a million items - you're bound to find what you want, at a price you'll love! 30 DAY RETURN POLICYNo questions asked, 30 day returns! FREE DELIVERYNo matter where you are in the UK, delivery is free. SECURE PAYMENTPeace of mind by paying through PayPal and eBay Buyer Protection TheNile_Item_ID:137741043; , Neu, Festpreisangebot, [LT: FixedPrice], ISBN-13: 9780226314518, Book Title: Lesser Harms, EAN: 9780226314518, Publication Year: 2004, Type: Textbook, Format: Hardcover, Language: English, Publication Name: Lesser Harms: the Morality of Risk in Medical Research, Item Height: 231mm, Item Width: 152mm, Subject: Medicine, Item Weight: 494g, Number of Pages: 246 Pages, T.H.E. University of Chicago Press<

2004, ISBN: 0226314510

Pasta dura

[EAN: 9780226314518], Neubuch, [PU: The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL], Hardcover. Research physicians face intractable dilemmas when they consider introducing new medical proc… Más…

[EAN: 9780226314518], Neubuch, [PU: The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL], Hardcover. Research physicians face intractable dilemmas when they consider introducing new medical procedures. Innovations carry the promise of preventing or curing life-threatening diseases, but they can also lead to injury or even death. How have clinical scientists made high-stakes decisions about undertaking human tests of new medical treatments? In Lesser Harms, Sydney Halpern explores this issue as she examines vaccine trials in America during the early and mid-twentieth century.Today's scientists follow federal guidelines for research on human subjects developed during the 1960s and 1970s. But long before these government regulations, medical investigators observed informal rules when conducting human research. They insisted that the dangers of natural disease should outweigh the risks of a medical intervention, and they struggled to accurately assess the relative hazards. Halpern explores this logic of risk in immunization controversies extending as far back as the eighteenth century. Then, focusing on the period between 1930 and 1960, she shows how research physicians and their sponsors debated the moral quandaries involved in moving vaccine use from the laboratory to the clinic.This probing work vividly describes the efforts of clinical investigators to balance the benefits and dangers of untested vaccines, to respond to popular sentiment about medical hazards, and to strategically present risk laden research to sponsors and the public. Concise and extremely well-written. . . . A fascinating synthesis of sociology, history, and institutional theory.Samuel C. Blackman, Journal of the American Medical Association Research physicians face intractable dilemmas when they consider introducing new medical procedures. Innovations carry the promise of preventing or curing life-threatening diseases, but they can also lead to injury or even death. How have clinical scientists made high-stakes decisions about undertaking human tests of new medical treatments? In "Lesser Harms," Sydney Halpern explores this issue as she examines vaccine trials in America during the early and mid-twentieth century. Today's scientists follow federal guidelines for research on human subjects developed during the 1960s and 1970s. But long before these government regulations, medical investigators observed informal rules when conducting human research. They insisted that the dangers of natural disease should outweigh the risks of a medical intervention, and they struggled to accurately assess the relative hazards. Halpern explores this logic of risk in immunization controversies extending as far back as the eighteenth century. Then, focusing on the period between 1930 and 1960, she shows how research physicians and their sponsors debated the moral quandaries involved in moving vaccine use from the laboratory to the clinic. This probing work vividly describes the efforts of clinical investigators to balance the benefits and dangers of untested vaccines, to respond to popular sentiment about medical hazards, and to strategically present risk laden research to sponsors and the public. "Concise and extremely well-written. . . . A fascinating synthesis of sociology, history, and institutional theory."—Samuel C. Blackman, "Journal of the American Medical Association " Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability., Books<

2004, ISBN: 0226314510

Pasta dura

[EAN: 9780226314518], Neubuch, [PU: The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL], Hardcover. Research physicians face intractable dilemmas when they consider introducing new medical proc… Más…

[EAN: 9780226314518], Neubuch, [PU: The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL], Hardcover. Research physicians face intractable dilemmas when they consider introducing new medical procedures. Innovations carry the promise of preventing or curing life-threatening diseases, but they can also lead to injury or even death. How have clinical scientists made high-stakes decisions about undertaking human tests of new medical treatments? In Lesser Harms, Sydney Halpern explores this issue as she examines vaccine trials in America during the early and mid-twentieth century.Today's scientists follow federal guidelines for research on human subjects developed during the 1960s and 1970s. But long before these government regulations, medical investigators observed informal rules when conducting human research. They insisted that the dangers of natural disease should outweigh the risks of a medical intervention, and they struggled to accurately assess the relative hazards. Halpern explores this logic of risk in immunization controversies extending as far back as the eighteenth century. Then, focusing on the period between 1930 and 1960, she shows how research physicians and their sponsors debated the moral quandaries involved in moving vaccine use from the laboratory to the clinic.This probing work vividly describes the efforts of clinical investigators to balance the benefits and dangers of untested vaccines, to respond to popular sentiment about medical hazards, and to strategically present risk laden research to sponsors and the public. Concise and extremely well-written. . . . A fascinating synthesis of sociology, history, and institutional theory.Samuel C. Blackman, Journal of the American Medical Association Research physicians face intractable dilemmas when they consider introducing new medical procedures. Innovations carry the promise of preventing or curing life-threatening diseases, but they can also lead to injury or even death. How have clinical scientists made high-stakes decisions about undertaking human tests of new medical treatments? In "Lesser Harms," Sydney Halpern explores this issue as she examines vaccine trials in America during the early and mid-twentieth century. Today's scientists follow federal guidelines for research on human subjects developed during the 1960s and 1970s. But long before these government regulations, medical investigators observed informal rules when conducting human research. They insisted that the dangers of natural disease should outweigh the risks of a medical intervention, and they struggled to accurately assess the relative hazards. Halpern explores this logic of risk in immunization controversies extending as far back as the eighteenth century. Then, focusing on the period between 1930 and 1960, she shows how research physicians and their sponsors debated the moral quandaries involved in moving vaccine use from the laboratory to the clinic. This probing work vividly describes the efforts of clinical investigators to balance the benefits and dangers of untested vaccines, to respond to popular sentiment about medical hazards, and to strategically present risk laden research to sponsors and the public. "Concise and extremely well-written. . . . A fascinating synthesis of sociology, history, and institutional theory."—Samuel C. Blackman, "Journal of the American Medical Association " Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability., Books<

2004, ISBN: 9780226314518

UNIV OF CHICAGO PR, Gebundene Ausgabe, Auflage: New, 246 Seiten, Publiziert: 2004-11-15T00:00:01Z, Produktgruppe: Buch, 1.06 kg, Medizin, Kategorien, Bücher, Sozialwissenschaft, Medizinbe… Más…

UNIV OF CHICAGO PR, Gebundene Ausgabe, Auflage: New, 246 Seiten, Publiziert: 2004-11-15T00:00:01Z, Produktgruppe: Buch, 1.06 kg, Medizin, Kategorien, Bücher, Sozialwissenschaft, Medizinbedarf & Geräte, Wörterbücher & Nachschlagewerke, Medizin & Gesundheitsdienste, Fachbücher, Medizinische Ethik, Verwaltung & Richtlinien, Ingenieurwissenschaft & Technik, Naturwissenschaften & Technik, Fremdsprachige Bücher, Englische Bücher, UNIV OF CHICAGO PR, 2004<