2011, ISBN: 9400715056

[EAN: 9789400715059], Neubuch, [SC: 0.0], [PU: Springer Netherlands], POLITIK / POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT; POLITOLOGIE; PHILOSOPHIE RECHT; RECHTSPHILOSOPHIE; AGEOFANCIENRÉGIME; CASELAWBOOK; CON… Más…

[EAN: 9789400715059], Neubuch, [SC: 0.0], [PU: Springer Netherlands], POLITIK / POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT; POLITOLOGIE; PHILOSOPHIE RECHT; RECHTSPHILOSOPHIE; AGEOFANCIENRÉGIME; CASELAWBOOK; CONSTITUTIONALISM; CUSTOMARYLAW; GAZETTEDESTRIBUNAUX; HERMENEUTIC; HOBBES; INTERPRETATIONINLAW; INTERPRETATIONINTHE18THCENTURY; JUDICIALPOWER; LEGALINTERPRETATION; LEGALTEXTS; LEIBNIZ; NATURALLAW; PANDECTISTS; PRIVATELAWS; PUBLICLAWS; REASONINDECISIONS; ROMANLAW; ROYALORDINANCE; JUDICIALINTERPRETATION, Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of interpretation of law in the 18th century. The goal: establishing the actual practice in the Age of Enlightenment, and explaining why this was the case. The ideology of the Age was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. However, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice. Hence, interpretation to unify the norms was inevitable. What was the process What role did justification in terms of reason, the hallmark of the Enlightenment, play These are some of the questions addressed. This book examines the actual practice of the interpretation of law in the Age of Enlightenment versus the ideology of the Age and explains the reason for and difference between the two. The ideology of the Age of Enlightenment was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. Yet, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice, making interpretation to unify the norms inevitable. This book discusses the process involved and the role played by justification in terms of reason - the hallmark of Enlightenment., Books<

2011, ISBN: 9400715056

[EAN: 9789400715059], Neubuch, [SC: 0.0], [PU: Springer Netherlands], POLITIK / POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT; POLITOLOGIE; PHILOSOPHIE RECHT; RECHTSPHILOSOPHIE; ANCIEN RÉGIME; CASE LAW BOOK; CONST… Más…

[EAN: 9789400715059], Neubuch, [SC: 0.0], [PU: Springer Netherlands], POLITIK / POLITIKWISSENSCHAFT; POLITOLOGIE; PHILOSOPHIE RECHT; RECHTSPHILOSOPHIE; ANCIEN RÉGIME; CASE LAW BOOK; CONSTITUTIONALISM; CUSTOMARY LAW; GAZETTE DES TRIBUNAUX; HERMENEUTIC; HOBBES; INTERPRETATION IN THE 18TH CENTURY; JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION; POWER; LEGAL TEXTS; LEIBNIZ; NATURAL PANDECTISTS; PRIVATE LAWS; PUBLIC REASON DECISIONS; ROMAN ROYAL ORDINANCE, Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of interpretation of law in the 18th century. The goal: establishing the actual practice in the Age of Enlightenment, and explaining why this was the case. The ideology of the Age was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. However, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice. Hence, interpretation to unify the norms was inevitable. What was the process What role did justification in terms of reason, the hallmark of the Enlightenment, play These are some of the questions addressed. This book examines the actual practice of the interpretation of law in the Age of Enlightenment versus the ideology of the Age and explains the reason for and difference between the two. The ideology of the Age of Enlightenment was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. Yet, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice, making interpretation to unify the norms inevitable. This book discusses the process involved and the role played by justification in terms of reason - the hallmark of Enlightenment., Books<

2001, ISBN: 9789400715059

[ED: Buch], [PU: Springer Netherlands], Neuware - A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of int… Más…

[ED: Buch], [PU: Springer Netherlands], Neuware - A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of interpretation of law in the 18th century. The goal: establishing the actual practice in the Age of Enlightenment, and explaining why this was the case. The ideology of the Age was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. However, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice. Hence, interpretation to unify the norms was inevitable. What was the process What role did justification in terms of reason, the hallmark of the Enlightenment, play These are some of the questions addressed. This book examines the actual practice of the interpretation of law in the Age of Enlightenment versus the ideology of the Age and explains the reason for and difference between the two. The ideology of the Age of Enlightenment was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. Yet, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice, making interpretation to unify the norms inevitable. This book discusses the process involved and the role played by justification in terms of reason - the hallmark of Enlightenment.- Besorgungstitel - vorauss. Lieferzeit 3-5 Tage., DE, [SC: 0.00], Neuware, gewerbliches Angebot, 241x160x15 mm, 216, [GW: 494g], Banküberweisung, Offene Rechnung, Kreditkarte, PayPal, Offene Rechnung (Vorkasse vorbehalten), Internationaler Versand<

2011, ISBN: 9789400715059

[ED: Hardcover], [PU: Springer / Springer Netherlands], A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice … Más…

[ED: Hardcover], [PU: Springer / Springer Netherlands], A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of interpretation of law in the 18th century. The goal: establishing the actual practice in the Age of Enlightenment, and explaining why this was the case. The ideology of the Age was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. However, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice. Hence, interpretation to unify the norms was inevitable. What was the process? What role did justification in terms of reason, the hallmark of the Enlightenment, play? These are some of the questions addressed. This book examines the actual practice of the interpretation of law in the Age of Enlightenment versus the ideology of the Age and explains the reason for and difference between the two. The ideology of the Age of Enlightenment was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. Yet, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice, making interpretation to unify the norms inevitable. This book discusses the process involved and the role played by justification in terms of reason - the hallmark of Enlightenment. 2011. xix, 193 S. XIX, 193 p. 235 mm Versandfertig in 6-10 Tagen, DE, [SC: 0.00], Neuware, gewerbliches Angebot, Offene Rechnung (Vorkasse vorbehalten)<

ISBN: 9789400715059

A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of interpretation of law in the 18th century. The goal&#… Más…

A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of interpretation of law in the 18th century. The goal: establishing the actual practice in the Age of Enlightenment, and explaining why this was the case. The ideology of the Age was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. However, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice. Hence, interpretation to unify the norms was inevitable. What was the process? What role did justification in terms of reason, the hallmark of the Enlightenment, play? These are some of the questions addressed. New Textbooks>Hardcover>Philosophy>Philosophy>Philosophy, Springer Netherlands Core >2 >T<